It was unseasonably warm in New York City yesterday, as temperatures hovered in the mid-50s.

But that didn't stop Kim Kardashian from breaking out a pair of fur coats, much to the chagrin of an organization that actually rivals this reality star in its need for attention.

Is PETA 2 FUR-ious at Kim Kardashian for these coats?

After seeing photos of Kim in the attire above, PETA released the following statement:

“Kim Kardashian is a woman who has everything - except, it seems, an ounce of sympathy for the animals who have the fur ripped off their backs so that she can purchase yet another gaudy jacket. We wish she would take a cue from her fur-free sister, Khloé Kardashian - but evidently, kindness and generosity don’t run in the family.”

Snaps, yo.

It's true that Khloe got naked for a PETA campaign months ago, but it's also true she simply dd that as a way to garner attention.

As for her sister, you tell us: Does PETA make a compelling case? Kim in a fur coat is...